Response to open Peer commentaries on “must research participants understand randomization?”

American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):W1 – W2 (2009)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15265160802715656
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,149
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Equipoise May Be in the Eye of the Beholder.Anne Moyer & Anna H. L. Floyd - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):21 – 22.
To Study, Perchance to Treat.Howard Trachtman - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):11 – 12.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Must Research Participants Understand Randomization?David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-02-01

Total views
35 ( #263,718 of 2,289,429 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #406,937 of 2,289,429 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature