Res Publica 17 (2):175-192 (2011)
Philip Pettit’s republican conception of freedom is presented as an alternative both to negative and positive conceptions of freedom. The basic idea is to conceptualize freedom as non-domination, not as non-interference or self-mastery. When compared to negative freedom, Pettit’s republican conception comprises two controversial claims: the claim that we are unfree if we are dominated without actual interference, and the claim that we are free if we face interference without domination. Because the slave is a widely accepted paradigm of the unfree person, the case of a slave with a non-interfering master is often cited as providing a good argument for the first republican claim and against a negative conception of freedom. One aim of this article is to raise doubts about whether this is true. The other aim of the article is to show that the prisoner—also a paradigm of the unfree person—presents a good argument against the second republican claim and in favour of a negative conception of freedom. This is called the ‘prisoner-argument’. It will be argued that neither Pettit’s distinction between free persons and free choices nor his distinction between compromising and conditioning factors of freedom can help to rebut the charge of the prisoner-argument
|Keywords||Philip Pettit Liberty Freedom Domination Interference Republicanism Slavery|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government.Philip Pettit (ed.) - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Revising Republican Liberty: What is the Difference Between a Disinterested Gentle Giant and a Deterred Criminal?Nikolas Kirby - 2015 - Res Publica 22 (4):369-386.
Similar books and articles
Republican Freedom, Rights, and the Coalition Problem.K. Dowding - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):301-322.
Impunity and Domination: A Puzzle for Republicanism.R. B. Talisse - 2014 - European Journal of Political Theory 13 (2):121-131.
Reconstructing Republican Freedom: A Critique of the Neo-Republican Concept of Freedom as Non-Domination.M. J. Thompson - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (3):277-298.
Republican Freedom and the Rule of Law.Christian List - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):201-220.
A Note on List's Modal Logic of Republican Freedom.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (3):341-349.
Non-Domination and Pure Negative Liberty.M. D. Harbour - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):186-205.
Freedom as Non-Domination or How to Throw the Agent Out of the Space of Reasons.Eva Erman - 2011 - Journal of Power 3 (1).
Discourse Theory and Republican Freedom.Philip Pettit - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):72-95.
Market Freedom as Antipower.Robert S. Taylor - 2013 - American Political Science Review 107 (3):593-602.
The Impossibility of a Paretian Republican? Some Comments on Pettit and Sen.Christian List - 2004 - Economics and Philosophy 20 (1):65-87.
Added to index2011-04-18
Total downloads79 ( #62,976 of 2,146,236 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,805 of 2,146,236 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.