Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?

Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):389-392 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Payment for research participation has raised ethical concerns, especially with respect to its potential for coercion. We argue that characterising payment for research participation as coercive is misguided, because offers of benefit cannot constitute coercion. In this article we analyse the concept of coercion, refute mistaken conceptions of coercion and explain why the offer of payment for research participation is never coercive but in some cases may produce undue inducement



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 83,948

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Sexual Harassment Coercive Offer.James Rocha - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (2):203-216.
The Last Word on Coercive Offers …(?).Daniel Lyons - 1982 - Philosophy Research Archives 8:393-414.
Prospective payment and medical ethics.Charles E. Begley - 1987 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (2):107-122.
Is Law Coercive?Williams A. Edmundson - 1995 - Legal Theory 1 (1):81-111.
Is payment a benefit?Alan Wertheimer - 2011 - Bioethics 27 (2):105-116.


Added to PP

60 (#217,835)

6 months
2 (#330,166)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles