Rethinking boltzmannian equilibrium

Philosophy of Science 82 (5):1224-1235 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Boltzmannian statistical mechanics partitions the phase space of a sys- tem into macro-regions, and the largest of these is identified with equilibrium. What justifies this identification? Common answers focus on Boltzmann’s combinatorial argument, the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, and maxi- mum entropy considerations. We argue that they fail and present a new answer. We characterise equilibrium as the macrostate in which a system spends most of its time and prove a new theorem establishing that equilib- rium thus defined corresponds to the largest macro-region. Our derivation is completely general in that it does not rely on assumptions about a system’s dynamics or internal interactions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-27

Downloads
744 (#37,713)

6 months
144 (#38,612)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Charlotte Werndl
University of Salzburg
Roman Frigg
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

In Search of the Holy Grail: How to Reduce the Second Law of Thermodynamics.Katie Robertson - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (4):987-1020.
Reversing the arrow of time.Bryan W. Roberts - 2022 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Time and Chance.David Z. Albert - 2000 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Time and Chance.S. French - 2005 - Mind 114 (453):113-116.
Taking Thermodynamics Too Seriously.Craig Callender - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (4):539-553.

View all 18 references / Add more references