In Empowering Our Military Conscience (2010)
Neither M. Walzer's collectivist conception of the "moral equality" of combatants, nor its antithetical individualist conceptions of responsibility are compatible with the ethos of military professionalism and its conception(s) of the responsibility of military professionals for service in an unjust war.
|Keywords||professionalism moral equality of combatants responsibility collectivism obedience loyalty conscience war conventions military civilian control|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
An Analysis of Moral Dissent: An Army Officer's Public Protest of the Vietnam War.William A. Gouveia - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (1):53-60.
Michael Walzer's Just War Theory: Some Issues of Responsibility. [REVIEW]Igor Primoratz - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (2):221-243.
Responsibility and Culpability in War.Helene Ingierd & Henrik Syse - 2005 - Journal of Military Ethics 4 (2):85-99.
Killing in War and Moral Equality.Stephen R. Shalom - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (4):495-512.
Licence to Kill? The Question of Just Vs. Unjust Combatants.Lene Bomann-Larsen - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):142-160.
Reconnoitering Combatant Moral Equality.Roger Wertheimer - 2007 - Journal of Military Ethics 6 (1):60-74.
The Morality of Military Ethics Education.Roger Wertheimer - 2010 - In Empowering Our Military Conscience.
Performance-Enhancing Technologies and Moral Responsibility in the Military.Jessica Wolfendale - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):28 – 38.
Added to index2010-01-23
Total downloads353 ( #7,723 of 2,163,617 )
Recent downloads (6 months)74 ( #2,323 of 2,163,617 )
How can I increase my downloads?