Biotechnology and Transgenics in Agriculture and Aquaculture: The Perspective from Ecosystem Integrity

Environmental Values 7 (1):79-96 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

New agricultural technologies are often justified morally in terms of their expected benefits, e.g., feeding the world's hungry. Such justifications stand or fall, not only on whether such benefits are indeed forthcoming, but on whether or not they are outweighed by attendant dangers. The practical details of easch case are, therefore, all-important. In this paper agriculture and aquaculture are examined from the perspective of ecosystem integrity, and with further reference to the uncertain effects of anthropogenic changes in the earth's atmosphere. The principle of integrity provides a strong justification for a cautious approach to new technologies, and particularly so in the case of transgenics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Examining Ecosystem Integrity.Bruce Morito - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (1):59-73.
Biotechnology is compatible with sustainable agriculture.Donald Duvick - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):112-125.
Animal welfare and organic aquaculture in open systems.Stephanie Yue Cottee & Paul Petersan - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (5):437-461.
The Value of Ecosystem Health.J. Baird Callicott - 1995 - Environmental Values 4 (4):345 - 361.
Biotechnology is not compatible with sustainable agriculture.Martha L. Crouch - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):98-111.
Perspectives on Ecological Integrity.Laura Westra & John Lemons - 1999 - Environmental Values 8 (1):116-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
8 (#1,243,760)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?