Logique Et Analyse 55 (217):109-120 (2012)
This is a reply to H. Ben-Yami, 'Generalized quantifiers, and beyond' (this journal, 2009), where he argues that standard GQ theory does not explain why natural language quantifiers have a restricted domain of quantification. I argue, on the other hand, that although GQ theory gives no deep explanation of this fact, it does give a sort of explanation, whereas Ben-Yami's suggested alternative is no improvement.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Plural Quantification Logic: A Critical Appraisal.Hanoch Ben-yami - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):208-232.
Attributive Adjectives and the Predicate Calculus.Hanoch Ben-Yami - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 83 (3):277 - 289.
Review of D. Oderberg (Ed.), The Old New Logic: Essays on the Philosophy of Fred Sommers. [REVIEW]Hanoch Ben-Yami - 2007 - Mind 116 (461):197-202.
Critical Study of Amie L. Thomasson, Ordinary Objects.Hanoch Ben-Yami - 2008 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):267-279.
Against Characterizing Mental States as Propositional Attitudes.Hanoch Ben-Yami - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (186):84-89.
Added to index2012-09-03
Total downloads26 ( #193,931 of 2,158,177 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #356,322 of 2,158,177 )
How can I increase my downloads?