Hegel's attitude toward Jacobi in the “third attitude of thought toward objectivity”

Southern Journal of Philosophy 27 (1):135-156 (1989)
In the conceptual preliminaries of his philosophical Encyclopedia Hegel discusses three approaches to epistemology under the headings of three ‘Attitudes of Thought Toward Objectivity’. The third of these is Jacobi’s doctrine of ‘immediate’ or intuitive knowledge. Hegel’s discussion presumes great familiarity with Jacobi’s highly polemical and now seldom read texts. In this essay I disambiguate and reconstruct Hegel’s discussion of Jacobi, in close consideration of Jacobi’s texts, showing why Hegel finds him important and what Hegel’s objections to his doctrines are. Jacobi’s importance for Hegel lies in three points. First, Hegel agrees with Jacobi’s claim, against Kant, that God and the world are themselves knowable. Second, Hegel must answer Jacobi’s charge that discursive thinking ineluctably leads to determinism and ultimately to nihilism. Third, Hegel’s analysis of Jacobi’s doctrine of ‘immediate knowledge’ reveals some points that are important to Hegel’s metaphysics. Hegel mounts five objections to Jacobi’s doctrine. First, Jacobi’s key term ‘immediacy’ illicitly equivocates among the rejection of three different kinds of ‘mediation’: syllogistic inference, the application of concepts, and representational accounts of perception. Second, Jacobi’s doctrine of a-conceptual knowledge is untenable because one must apply concepts to objects in order identify objects and thus to know what kinds of things known objects are. Third, if a fundamental point of Hegel’s holistic ontology (explained in the essay) is correct, then the identity conditions of things are interdependent, and this interdependence would render ‘immediate’ knowledge impossible. Fourth, Jacobi’s doctrine is self-referentially inconsistent: it is possible on his doctrine to prove that his doctrine is false. Finally, Jacobi’s doctrine licenses question-begging and is in principle unable to address or to settle disagreements among divergent intuitions.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0038-4283
DOI 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1989.tb00480.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,721
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Vitalism and System.Rolf Ahlers - 2003 - Idealistic Studies 33 (1):83-113.
Transcendental Idealism and the Problem of the External World.Richard Fincham - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2):221-241.
Making Room for Reason.Kipton E. Jensen - 2000 - Philosophy and Theology 12 (2):359-376.
Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi.Author unknown - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hegel and Naturphilosophie.Frederick Beiser - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):135-147.
Is Hegel's Master–Slave Dialectic a Refutation of Solipsism?Robert Stern - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):333-361.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

33 ( #153,959 of 2,158,842 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #64,582 of 2,158,842 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums