David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Philosophical Quarterly 33 (3):263-272 (1993)
In Hegel’s Idealism, Robert Pippin contends that Hegel develops a more adequate version of Fichte’s idealism, where the key to idealism lies in the general thesis that there are conditions presupposed by self-conscious judgments about objects. Focusing on this thesis led post-Kantian German idealists to dismiss Kant’s doctrine that space and time are a priori forms of intuition and to develop views of the autonomy of human reason in terms of thought’s self-determination. While Pippin and I agree on some fundamentals, we disagree diametrically about the nature of Hegel’s idealism. Four of my main objections are these. (1) The thesis that there are conditions for self-conscious judgments about objects only entails idealism given certain kinds of conditions (such as Kant’s doctrines about space and time). (2) Hegel expressly denies that ‘the autonomy of thought’ primarily concerns the autonomy of human thinking. (3) Pippin’s interpretation of Hegel’s chapter on ‘Force and Understanding’, which is decisive for his interpretation of Hegel’s idealism, is not borne out by the examples Hegel uses to illustrate and defend his view. (4) Hegel’s frequent use in his Logics of categories that plainly derive from contingent features of our world is not, as Pippin would have it, an ironic concession that marks the reductio ad absurdum of Hegel’s view. On the contrary, such categories and their empirical basis is central to Hegel’s idealism, which is deeply naturalistic and expressly based in the empirical sciences. (1,000 word abstract in: Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 65.6 (1992):64–65.)
|Keywords||Catholic Tradition Contemporary Philosophy History of Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kenneth R. Westphal (2006). Contemporary Epistemology: Kant, Hegel, McDowell. European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):274–301.
Similar books and articles
Tom Rockmore (2004). Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy. Yale University Press.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1996). Kant, Hegel, and the Transcendental Material Conditions of Possible Experience. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 33:23-41.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2006). Hegel and Realism. In John R. Shook & Joseph Margolis (eds.), A Companion to Pragmatism. Blackwell.
Howard Ponzer (2008). Reconciliation in Hegel's Speculative Idealism. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):49-66.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2009). Does Kant’s Opus Postumum Anticipate Hegel’s Absolute Idealism? In E.-O. Onnasch (ed.), Kants Philosophie der Natur. Ihre Entwicklung bis zum Opus postumum und Nachwirkung. deGruyter.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2007). Intelligenz and the Interpretation of Hegel's Idealism. The Owl of Minerva 39 (1-2):95-134.
John Hund (1998). Hegel's Break with Kant: The Leap From Individual Psychology to Sociology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (2):226-243.
Franz Gabriel Nauen (1972). Revolution, Idealism and Human Freedom: Schelling, Hölderlin and Hegel and the Crisis of Early German Idealism. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
Karen Ng (2009). Hegel's Logic of Actuality. Review of Metaphysics 63 (1):139-172.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads33 ( #145,678 of 1,924,985 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #308,471 of 1,924,985 )
How can I increase my downloads?