Kant’s Cognitive Semantics, Newton’s Rule Four of Philosophy and Scientific Realism
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 63:27-49 (2011)
Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason contains an original and powerful semantics of singular cognitive reference which has important implications for epistemology and for philosophy of science. Here I argue that Kant’s semantics directly and strongly supports Newton’s Rule 4 of Philosophy in ways which support Newton’s realism about gravitational force. I begin with Newton’s Rule 4 of Philosophy and its role in Newton’s justification of realism about gravitational force (§2). Next I briefly summarize Kant’s semantics of singular cognitive reference (§3), and then show that it is embedded in and strongly supports Newton’s Rule 4, and that it rules out not only Cartesian physics (per Harper) but also Cartesian, infallibilist presumptions about empirical justification generally (§4). This result exposes a key fallacy in Bas van Fraassen’s original argument for his anti-realist Constructive Empiricism (§5).
|Keywords||cognitive semantics Newton Rule 4 constructive empiricism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Hypothesis of Ether and Reid's Interpretation of Newton's First Rule of Philosophizing.Robert Callergård - 1999 - Synthese 120 (1):19-26.
‘Hegel’s Phenomenological Method and Analysis of Consciousness’.Kenneth R. Westphal - 2009 - In K. R. Westphal (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Blackwell. pp. 1--36.
Do Newton's Rules of Reasoning Guarantee Truth ... Must They?Quayshawn Spencer - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35 (4):759-782.
Qualities, Properties, and Laws in Newton's Induction.David Marshall Miller - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):1052-1063.
Newton's Substance Monism, Distant Action, and the Nature of Newton's Empiricism: Discussion of H. Kochiras “Gravity and Newton's Substance Counting Problem”.Eric Schliesser - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):160-166.
On Reading Newton as an Epicurean: Kant, Spinozism and the Changes to the Principia.Eric Schliesser - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):416-428.
The Anticipation of Necessity: Kant on Kepler's Laws and Universal Gravitation.Scott Tanona - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):421-443.
The General Scholium: Some Notes on Newton's Published and Unpublished Endeavours.Steffen Ducheyne - unknown
Kant’s Proof of the Law of Inertia.Kenneth R. Westphal - 1995 - In H. Robinson (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress. Marquette University Press.
Newton and Kant: Quantity of Matter in the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.Michael Friedman - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):482-503.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-11
Total downloads1 ( #872,133 of 2,158,237 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #355,837 of 2,158,237 )
How can I increase my downloads?