Kant, Hegel, and Determining Our Duties

Kenneth R. Westphal
Bogazici University
Hegel identified in Kant’s practical philosophy precisely the powerful kind of constructivism about the identification and justification of norms that has recently been explicated by Onora O’Neill. If so (I have argued elsewhere this is so), what then did Hegel contribute to practical philosophy? This essay partly answers this question by examining Kant’s and Hegel’s views of the aim and structure of practical philosophy, and what is required to determine specific duties. This theme is specified by examining these issues: two oversights in Kant’s justification of rights to possession (§2), the role of philosophical anthropology in Kant’s universalization tests (§3), the roles of social institutions in specifying our ethical obligations (§4), Kant’s under-developed view of government (§5), and Hegel’s claim that, in contrast to Kant’s Rechtslehre, his Rechtsphilosophie provides an „immanent“ doctrine of duties (§6). I argue that Hegel attempted to respond to his own criticisms of Kant’s Categorical Imperative, and in doing so, Hegel contributed to practical philosophy in ways that Kantians and other moral, social and legal philosophers should consider seriously.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Enlightenment, Reason and Universalism: Kant’s Critical Insights.Kenneth R. Westphal - 2016 - Studies in East European Thought 68 (2-3):127-148.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hegel's Critique of Kant.Stephen Priest (ed.) - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Moral World View.Kenneth R. Westphal - 1991 - Philosophical Topics 19 (2):133-176.
Contemporary Epistemology: Kant, Hegel, McDowell.Kenneth R. Westphal - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):274–301.
Hegel's Break with Kant: The Leap From Individual Psychology to Sociology.John Hund - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (2):226-243.
Hegel on Space: A Critique of Kant's Transcendental Philosophy.Scott Jenkins - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (4):326-355.
Hegel on Kant's 'Synthetic A Priori' in "Glauben Und Wissen".Dennis Schulting - 2005 - In Andreas Arndt, Henning Ottman & Karol Bal (eds.), Hegel-Jahrbuch. Akademie Verlag. pp. 176-182.
How "Full" is Kant's Categorical Imperative?Kenneth Westphal - 1995 - Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 3:465-509.
Hegel's Critique of Metaphysics.Béatrice Longuenesse - 2007 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel’s Critique of Kant.Robert R. Williams - 2006 - The Owl of Minerva 38 (1/2):9-34.


Added to PP index

Total views
3 ( #1,357,999 of 2,507,018 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,018 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes