Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 60 (1):49-71 (2012)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Kant and Adorno alike have assumed that hope plays a central role in the relation between ethics and happiness. After comparing some of their different interpretations of hope, this paper traces the philosophical account of the concept of hope which Kant and Adorno, however, agree on. They both see hope as essential for bridging the gulf between normativity and realities. Hope, they argue, features a weaker doxastic state than belief but a stronger one than wishful thinking. For Kant, the question, "what may I hope?" is part of the interests of human reason. By modifying this conception of hope, Adorno advocates a notion of hope, which accounts for a critique of religion and metaphysics
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1524/dzph.2012.0005 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Towards a Kantian Phenomenology of Hope.Deryck Beyleveld & Paul Ziche - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (5):927-942.
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-11-01
Total views
27 ( #425,437 of 2,518,240 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,240 )
2013-11-01
Total views
27 ( #425,437 of 2,518,240 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,240 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads