The 'epr' argument: A post-mortem

Philosophical Studies 40 (1):3 - 30 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00646385

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reconsidering Bohr's reply to EPR.Hans Halvorson & Rob Clifton - 2001 - In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-locality and Modality. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 3--18.
Management of Post-Mortem Pregnancy: Legal and Philosophical Aspects.Rodney Taylor - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 13 (1):37-37.
Einstein and EPR.Robert Deltete & Reed Guy - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (3):377-397.
Is post-mortem harm possible? Understanding death harm and grief.Floris Tomasini - 2008 - Bioethics 23 (8):441-449.
Causality and realism in the EPR experiment.Hasok Chang & Nancy Cartwright - 1993 - Erkenntnis 38 (2):169 - 190.
Quantum reference frames in the context of EPR.Michael Dickson - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):655-668.
Posthumous Harm.Steven Luper - 2004 - American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (1):63 - 72.
La démocratie post mortem.Tim Mulgan - 2003 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 101 (1):123-137.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
32 (#488,786)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Einstein and EPR.Robert Deltete & Reed Guy - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (3):377-397.
Epr.Alan Hájek & Jeffrey Bub - 1992 - Foundations of Physics 22 (3):313-332.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references