David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Mario D'Amato, Jay L. Garfield & Tom J. F. Tillemans (eds.), Pointing at the Moon: Buddhism, Logic, Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press (2009)
The so-called `no-thesis' view is without a doubt one of the most immediately puzzling philosophical features of Nāgārjuna's thought and also largely responsible for ascribing to him either sceptical or mystical leanings (or indeed both). The locus classicus for this view is found in verse 29 of the Vigrahavyāvartanī: “If I had some thesis the defect [just mentioned] would as a consequence attach to me. But I have no thesis, so this defect is not applicable to me.” That this absence of a thesis is to be regarded as a positive feature is stressed in a passage from the Yuktiṣaṣṭikā, where Nāgārjuna remarks about the Buddhas: “For these great beings there is no position, no dispute. How could there be another's [opposing] position for those who have no position?” Now it is important to observe that when considered in isolation it is very hard to make any coherent sense of these passages. For even if we assume that the Buddhas do not hold any philosophical position anymore (having perhaps passed beyond all conceptual thinking), how are we to make sense of the first quotation which, in the middle of a work full of philosophical theses claims that there is no such thesis asserted at all?
|Keywords||Nagarjuna Madhyamaka Vigrahvyavartani|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Eviatar Shulman (2010). The Commitments of a Madhyamaka Trickster: Innovation in Candrakīrti's Prasanna-Padā. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (4):379-417.
Jan Westerhoff (2008). Nāgārjuna's Arguments on Motion Revisited. Journal of Indian Philosophy 36 (4):455-479.
Cyrus Panjvani (2006). Wittgenstein and Strong Mathematical Verificationism. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (224):406–425.
J. B. Hainsworth (1974). The Making of Homeric Verse Adam Parry (Ed.): The Making of Homeric Verse. The Collected Papers of Milman Parry. Pp. Lxii+483; 2 Plates. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971. Cloth, £6. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 24 (01):12-14.
Jan Westerhoff (2009). Nāgārjuna's Madhyamaka: A Philosophical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Roger Jackson (1985). For Whom Emptiness Prevails: An Analysis of the Religious Implications of Nāgārjuna's "Vigrahavyāvartanī 70". Religious Studies 21 (3):407 - 414.
Ram Chandra Pandeya (1991). Nāgārjuna's Philosophy of No-Identity: With Philosophical Translations of the Madhyamaka-Kārikā, Śūnyatā-Saptati, and Vigrahavyāvartanī. Eastern Book Linkers.
Added to index2009-09-15
Total downloads363 ( #6,321 of 1,903,117 )
Recent downloads (6 months)28 ( #17,384 of 1,903,117 )
How can I increase my downloads?