Vision and Voice: Phenomenology and Theology in the Work of Jean-Luc Marion [Book Review]

The kind of phenomenology that can be useful to theology will be a hermeneutical phenomenology, one that takes us beyond the Cartesian/Husserlian ideal of presuppositionless intuition. It will also be a phenomenology of inverse intentionality, one in which the constituting subject is constituted by the look and the voice of another. In light of these suggestions, the phenomenology of Jean-Luc Marion is defended against three critiques, namely that it compromises the boundary between phenomenology and theology, that the theology it serves is a bad one to boot, and that it has an inadequate account of the subject. At the heart of this defense is Marion's clear distinction between phenomenology as a description of possible experience, and theology as the claim that a certain kind of experience, namely revelation or epiphany, is not merely actual but veridical. Phenomenology says, If revelation occurs it will be in the form of a saturated phenomenon. Theology says, for example, the burning bush was an epiphany, or Jesus Christ is a revelation. The attentive reader should have no trouble distinguishing Marion's phenomenological analyses, which should be persuasive to believer and unbeliever alike, from his theological claims. Marion's account of the subject falls under the heading of inverse intentionality, and there are hints that vision is aufgehoben in the voice. The seer is first of all the one seen, but above all the one addressed, called forth into response-able being
Keywords Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,411
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Jacques Derrida (2008). The Gift of Death. University of Chicago Press.
Emmanuel Levinas (1961/1969). Totality and Infinity. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Martin Heidegger (1998). Pathmarks. Cambridge University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Matthew I. Burch (2010). Blurred Vision: Marion on the 'Possibility' of Revelation. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (3):157 - 171.
Matthew I. Burch (2010). Blurred Vision: Marion on the ‘Possibility’ of Revelation. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (3):157-171.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

59 ( #82,666 of 1,924,718 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #308,186 of 1,924,718 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.