Dialectica 44 (1‐2):113-135 (1990)
Contemporary semantical discussions make mention of the traditional approach to semantics represented by Frege and/or Russell--even sometimes by Frege-Russell. Is there a Frege-Russell view in the philosophy of language? How much of a common semantical perspective did Frege and Russell share? The matter bears exploration. I begin with Frege and Russell on propositions.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Metaphysicians of Meaning: Russell and Frege on Sense and Denotation.Gideon Makin - 2000 - Routledge.
The Tractatus on Inference and Entailment.Ian Proops - 2002 - In Erich Reck (ed.), From Frege to Wittgenstein: Essays on Early Analytic Philosophy, 283–307. Oxford University Press.
A Cantorian Argument Against Frege's and Early Russell's Theories of Descriptions.Kevin C. Klement - 2009 - In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of. Routledge.
Russell's Paradox in Appendix B of the Principles of Mathematics : Was Frege's Response Adequate?Kevin C. Klement - 2001 - History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (1):13-28.
Putting Form Before Function: Logical Grammar in Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein.Kevin C. Klement - 2004 - Philosophers' Imprint 4 (2):1-47.
Russell, Frege, and the "Meaning" of the Theory of Descriptions (Or): Did Russell Know His Frege?R. K. Perkins - 1982 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 20 (4):407-423.
The Truth and Nothing but the Truth, yet Never the Whole Truth: Frege, Russell and the Analysis of Unities.Graham Stevens - 2003 - History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (3):221-240.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #336,698 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?