William Whewell: Problems of induction vs. problems of rationality

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):716-742 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The question whether attempts to vindicate induction should be abandoned in favor of (other) problems of rationality is pressing and difficult. How may we decide rationally when standards for rationality are at issue? It may be useful to first know how we have decided in the past. Whewell's philosophy of science and the reaction to it are discussed. Whewell's contemporaries mistakenly thought that only an inductivist research program could produce an adequate theory of rationality. But this very move violated their own standards of rationality. We should now avoid making the same mistake again. We should return to Whewell's rejected proposal to make the philosophy of science historical and seek thereby to improve rational practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Whewell and mill on induction.Harold T. Walsh - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (3):279-284.
Quantitative realizations of philosophy of science: William Whewell and statistical methods.Kent Johnson - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (3):399-409.
Styles of rationality.John Wettersten - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1):69-98.
Discoverers' induction.Laura J. Snyder - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):580-604.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#339,849)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?