Journal of Business Ethics 115 (4):755-769 (2013)

Abstract
I here distinguish dissensual from consensual corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the grounds that the former is more concerned to organize (or portray) corporate-civil society disagreement than it is corporate-civil society agreement. In doing so, I first conceive of consensual CSR, and identify a positive and negative view thereof. Second, I conceive of dissensual CSR, and suggest that it can be actualized through the construction of dissent enabling, rather than consent-oriented, public spheres. Following this, I describe four actor-centred institutional theories—i.e. a sociological, ethical, transformative and economic perspective, respectively—and suggest that an economic perspective is generally well suited to explaining CSR activities at the organizational level. Accordingly, I then use the economic perspective to analyse a dissent enabling public sphere that Shell has constructed, and within which Greenpeace participated. In particular, I explain Shell’s employment of dissensual CSR in terms of their core business interests; and identify some potential implications thereof for Shell, Greenpeace, and society more generally. In concluding, I highlight a number of ways in which the present paper can inform future research on business and society interactions
Keywords Actor-centred institutional theory  Corporate social responsibility  Consensus  Dissensus  Public sphere
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1823-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,593
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Agonistic Pluralism and Stakeholder Engagement.Cedric Dawkins - 2015 - Business Ethics Quarterly 25 (1):1-28.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Institutional Conditions of Corporate Citizenship.Ronald Jeurissen - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):87-96.
The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility.Jacob Dahi Rendtorff - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:111-117.
Profits and Principles: A Critical Discourse Analysis.Colin P. Higgins - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:130-135.
Corporate Social Responsibility: Assessing the Economic Approach.Duane Windsor - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:180-185.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
14 ( #716,592 of 2,462,054 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,768 of 2,462,054 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes