Consumerism in prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for ethical guidelines

Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):444-446 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ethical guidelines for prenatal diagnosis proposed by the World Health Organisation , as well as by national regulations, only refer to paternity and gender of the fetus as unacceptable, disease-unrelated criteria for prenatal selection, as no other such parameters are at hand so far. This perspective is too narrow because research on complex genetic systems such as cognition and ageing is about to provide clinically applicable tests for genetic constituents of potentially desirable properties such as intelligence or longevity which could be misused as parameters for prenatal diagnosis. Moreover, there is an increasing number of prenatally testable genetic traits, such as heritable deafness, which are generally regarded as pathological but desired by some prospective parents and taken into account as parameters for pro-disability selection. To protect prenatal diagnosis from ethically unacceptable genetic consumerism, guidelines must be clarified as soon as possible and updated towards a worldwide restriction of prenatal genetic testing to immediately disease-determining traits

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A new era in prenatal testing: are we prepared? [REVIEW]Dagmar Schmitz - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):357-364.
Autonomy and freedom of choice in prenatal genetic diagnosis.Elisabeth Hildt - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):65-72.
Prenatal Diagnosis: Confronting the Ethical Issues.V. N. Bolton - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (4):218-219.
Genetic counseling and termination of pregnancy in hungary.Zoltan Papp - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):323-333.
Prenatal diagnosis: whose right?D. Heyd - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (5):292-297.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
55 (#273,414)

6 months
6 (#349,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Selection of embryos.A. Slowther - 2008 - Clinical Ethics 3 (2):60-62.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the 'new' eugenics.D. S. King - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):176-182.
Genetic screening with the DNA chip: a new Pandora's box?W. Henn - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):200-203.

Add more references