Philosophy of Science 67 (3):410-420 (2000)
AbstractNo one has a well developed solution to Duhem's problem, the problem of how experimental evidence warrants revision of our theories. Deborah Mayo proposes a solution to Duhem's problem in route to her more ambitious program of providing a philosophical account of inductive inference and experimental knowledge. This paper is a response to Mayo's Error Statistics (ES) program, paying particular attention to her response to Duhem's problem. It turns out that Mayo's purported solution to Duhem's problem is very significant to her project, for the epistemic license claimed by ES and the philosophical underpinnings to her account of experimental knowledge depend on this solution. By introducing the partition problem, I argue that ES fails to solve Duhem's problem and therefore fails to provide an adequate account of experimental knowledge
Similar books and articles
Duhem in Different Contexts: Comments on Brenner and Martin.Philip L. Quinn - 1990 - Synthese 83 (3):357 - 362.
Motivational Realism: The Natural Classification for Pierre Duhem.Karen Merikangas Darling - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1125-1136.
The Bayesian Treatment of Auxiliary Hypotheses.Michael Strevens - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):515-537.
Holism a Century Ago: The Elaboration of Duhem's Thesis.Anastasios A. Brenner - 1990 - Synthese 83 (3):325 - 335.
Take Back the Day! Jon Dorling’s Bayesian Solution of the Duhem Problem.Richard Jeffrey - 1993 - Philosophical Issues 3:197-207.
Bayesian Confirmation and Auxiliary Hypotheses Revisited: A Reply to Strevens.Branden Fitelson & Andrew Waterman - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):293-302.
Experimental Psychology and Duhem's Problem.Sam S. Rakover - 2003 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 33 (1):45–66.
Duhem's Problem, the Bayesian Way, and Error Statistics, or "What's Belief Got to Do with It?".Deborah G. Mayo - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (2):222-244.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
‘Through Thousands of Errors We Reach the Truth’—but How? On the Epistemic Roles of Error in Scientific Practice.Jutta Schickore - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (3):539-556.
Acceptibility, Evidence, and Severity.Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Gordon G. Brittan - 2006 - Synthese 148 (2):259-293.
Error, Error-Statistics and Self-Directed Anticipative Learning.R. P. Farrell & C. A. Hooker - 2008 - Foundations of Science 14 (4):249-271.
Forging Model/World Relations: Relevance and Reliability.Isabelle Peschard - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (5):749-760.
References found in this work
La théorie physique: son objet et sa structure.P. Duhem - 1906 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 61:324-327.