Metaphilosophy 44 (3):293-300 (2013)

Gregory Wheeler
Frankfurt School Of Finance And Management
Michael Dummett famously maintained that analytic philosophy was simply philosophy that followed Frege in treating the philosophy of language as the basis for all other philosophy (1978, 441). But one important insight to emerge from computer science is how difficult it is to animate the linguistic artifacts that the analysis of thought produces. Yet, modeling the effects of thought requires a new skill that goes beyond analysis: procedural literacy. Some of the most promising research in philosophy makes use of a variety of modeling techniques that go beyond basic logic and elementary probability theory. What unifies this approach is a focus on what Alan Perlis called procedural literacy. This essay argues that the future spoils in philosophical research will disproportionally go to those who are procedurally literate.
Keywords Boolos  Perlis  procedural literacy  Frege
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/meta.12036
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,514
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Minds, Brains, and Programs.John R. Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
Change in View.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - MIT Press.
Truth and Other Enigmas.Michael A. E. Dummett - 1978 - Harvard University Press.
Change in View.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - Behaviorism 16 (1):93-96.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
138 ( #66,209 of 2,348,182 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #147,909 of 2,348,182 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes