Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (2):145-158 (2018)

In ‘Rethinking Nature: Phenomenology and a Non-reductionist Cognitive Science’, Gallagher [2019] sets out to overcome resistance to the idea that phenomenology is relevant to cognitive science. He argues that the relevance in question may be secured if we rethink the concept of nature. For Gallagher, this transformed concept of nature—which is to be distinguished from the classic scientific conception of nature in that it embraces irreducible subjectivity—is already at work in some contemporary enactive phenomenological approaches to cognitive science. Following a summary of Gallagher’s argument, we argue that this rethinking of nature is not necessary to secure the aim in question. We articulate two alternative ways of achieving the relevance of phenomenology to cognitive science. The first, which turns on a minimal notion of naturalism, leaves the classic scientific conception of nature intact. The second, which turns on a practice-based analysis of collaboration between phenomenology and cognitive science, leaves it open which concept of nature one should adopt. As we show, each of the proposals on the table comes at a cost. Which of the three proposals is the more attractive will depend on which cost one wants to pay.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/24740500.2018.1552085
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,159
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness.Bernard J. Baars - 1988 - Cambridge University Press.
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception.Marc H. Bornstein - 1980 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39 (2):203-206.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rethinking Again.Shaun Gallagher - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (2):234-245.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Remarks on Gallagher’s Enactivist Philosophy of Nature.David Macarthur - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (2):179-183.
The Hand of Nature in the Glove of Phenomenology: Reply to Gallagher.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (2):171-178.
The Role of Non-Reductive Naturalism: Cognitive Science or Phenomenology?Carl B. Sachs - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (2):229-233.
A Dilemma for Heideggerian Cognitive Science.David Suarez - 2017 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (5):909-930.
The Nature of Cognitive Phenomenology.Declan Smithies - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (8):744-754.
A Lexicon of Attention: From Cognitive Science to Phenomenology. [REVIEW]P. Sven Arvidson - 2003 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2 (2):99-132.
Merleau-Ponty and Embodied Cognitive Science.Christopher Pollard - 2014 - Discipline Filosofiche 24 (2):67-90.
Phenomenology of Language in a 4e-World.Andrew Inkpin - 2016 - In Jack Alan Reynolds & Richard Sebold (eds.), Phenomenology and Science. New York, USA: Palgrave. pp. 141-159.


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #496,495 of 2,454,833 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,241 of 2,454,833 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes