Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):566–572 (2003)
Robert Brandom claims that language expressing pro-attitudes makes explicit proprieties of practical inference. This thesis is untenable, especially given certain premises which Brandom himself endorses. Pro-attitude vocabulary has the wrong grammatical structure; other parts of vocabulary do the job he ascribes to pro-attitude vocabulary; the thesis introduces implausible differences between the inferential consequences of desires and intentions, and distorts the interpretation of conditional statements. Rather, I suggest, logical vocabulary can make proprieties of practical inference explicit, just as the inferentialist says it can for theoretical inference.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Brandom, Peirce, and the Overlooked Friction of Contrapiction.Marc Champagne - 2016 - Synthese 193 (8).
On Legal Inferentialism. Toward a Pragmatics of Semantic Content in Legal Interpretation?Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2007 - Ratio Juris 20 (1):32-44.
'Ought': The Correct Intention Account.Heath White - 2009 - Philosophical Explorations 12 (3):297-317.
Similar books and articles
Brandom on the Normativity of Meaning.Lionel Shapiro - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):141-60.
Answerable to the World: Experience and Practical Intentionality in Brandom's and McDowell's "Intramural" Debate.Steven Hendley - 2010 - Theoria 76 (2):129-151.
Expressivism and the Layer Cake Picture of Discursive Practice.David Lauer - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (1):55-73.
Must We Choose? Should We?Michael Kremer - 2010 - In Bernhard Weiss & Jeremy Wanderer (eds.), Reading Brandom: On Making It Explicit. Routledge. pp. 227.
Constructing Commitment: Brandom's Pragmatist Take on Rule-Following.Matthias Kiesselbach - 2012 - Philosophical Investigations 35 (2):101-126.
Pragmatism and Inferentialism.John MacFarlane - 2010 - In Bernhard Weiss & Jeremy Wanderer (eds.), Reading Brandom: On Making It Explici. Routledge. pp. 81--95.
The Logical Structure of Linguistic Commitment III Brandomian Scorekeeping and Incompatibility.Mark Lance - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (5):439-464.
Making It Implicit: Brandom on Rule-Following.Anandi Hattiangadi - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):419-31.
Making It Explicit and Clear: From "Strong" to "Hyper-" Inferentialism in Brandom and Peirce.Catherine Legg - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (1):105–123.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #221,129 of 2,177,930 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,203 of 2,177,930 )
How can I increase my downloads?