Acta Analytica 21 (3):3-22 (2006)

Authors
Daniel Whiting
University of Southampton
Abstract
Many philosophers accept that a naturalistic reduction of meaning is in principle impossible, since behavioural regularities or dispositions are consistent with any number of semantic descriptions. One response is to view meaning as primitive. In this paper, I explore Brandom’s alternative, which is to specify behaviour in non-semantic but normative terms. Against Brandom, I argue that a norm specified in non-semantic terms might correspond to any number of semantic norms. Thus, his theory of meaning suffers from the very same kind of problem as its naturalistic competitors. It is not sufficient, I contend, merely that some norms be introduced into one’s account but that they be specified using intensional, semantic notions on a par with that of meaning. In closing, I counter Brandom’s reasons for resisting such a position, the most significant of which is that it leaves philosophers with nothing constructive to say about meaning.
Keywords Brandom  inferentialism  pragmatism  semantics  naturalism  primitivism  quietism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12136-006-1007-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,319
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Science, Perception and Reality.Wilfrid Sellars (ed.) - 1963 - New York: Humanities Press.
Making It Explicit.Isaac Levi & Robert B. Brandom - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):145.

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On Epistemic Conceptions of Meaning: Use, Meaning and Normativity.Daniel Whiting - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):416-434.
Meaning Holism and De Re Ascription.Daniel Whiting - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):575-599.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Communication and Content: Circumstances and Consequences of the Habermas-Brandom Debate.Kevin Scharp - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (1):43 – 61.
Semantic Naturalism and Normativity.Nenad Smokrović - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):71-81.
Theories of Meaning and Truth Conditions.Kathrin Glüer - 2012 - In Manuel García-Carpintero & Max Kölbel (eds.), The Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Continuum International.
Robert Brandom on Communication, Reference, and Objectivity.Bernd Prien - 2010 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (3):433-458.
Internalized Meaning Factualism.Jakob Hohwy - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (3):325-336..
Brandom on the Normativity of Meaning.Lionel Shapiro - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):141-60.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
86 ( #125,006 of 2,448,752 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #225,044 of 2,448,752 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes