Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):233-261 (2012)
Abstract As non-state actors, PMSCs are not embraced by traditional state-dominated doctrines of international law. However, international law has itself failed to keep pace with the evolution of states and state-based actors, to which strong Westphalian notions of sovereignty are no longer applicable. It is argued that these structural inadequacies stand in the way of international regulation of PMSCs, rather than defects in international human rights and humanitarian law per se. By analyzing understandings of legal responsibility, where such structural issues come to the fore, it is argued that, rather than attempting to resolve the essentially ideological dispute about the inherent functions of a state, regulatory regimes should focus on the positive obligations of states and PMSCs, and the interactions between them. Applying the results of this analysis, current and proposed regulatory regimes are evaluated and their shortcomings revealed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Accountability for Private Military and Security Contractors in the International Legal Regime.Kristine A. Huskey - 2012 - Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):193-212.
Unaccountable: The Current State of Private Military and Security Companies.Marcus Hedahl - 2012 - Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):175-192.
A U.N. Convention to Regulate PMSCs?José L. Gómez del Prado - 2012 - Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):262-286.
Final Report on the Impact of International Human Rights Law on General International Law.M. Kamminga - unknown
Toward a Reformulation of International Refugee Law.Jack I. Garvey - 1985 - Harvard International Law Journal 26 (2):483-500.
Cultural Rights: The Possible Impact of Private Military and Security Companies.Ana Filipa Vrdoljak - unknown
Revisiting the Role of Private Military and Security Companies.George Andreopoulos & Shawna Brandle - 2012 - Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):138-157.
Accountability and Global Governance: Challenging the State-Centric Conception of Human Rights.Cristina Lafont - 2010 - Ethics and Global Politics 3 (3):193-215.
Business and the International Human Rights Regime: A Comparison of UN Initiatives. [REVIEW]Nina Seppala - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):401 - 417.
Getting to the Root of Gender Inequality: Structural Injustice and Political Responsibility.Serena Parekh - 2011 - Hypatia 26 (4):672-689.
Implementing the New UN Corporate Human Rights Framework.Peter Muchlinski - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (1):145-177.
Developing a Global Regime for Human Rights.Duane Windsor - 2009 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 4:83-105.
U.S. Hypocrisy in the Treatment of Non-State Actors in the War on Terror.Erin Louise Palmer - unknown
Global Responsibility for Human Rights: World Poverty and the Development of International Law.Margot E. Salomon & Foreword by Stephen P. Marks - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Risk-Driven Global Compliance Regimes in Banking and Accounting: The New Law Merchant.James Franklin - 2005 - Law, Probability and Risk 4 (4):237-250.
Added to index2012-11-13
Total downloads4 ( #648,442 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?