In Sophie Archer (ed.), Salience: A Philosophical Inquiry. pp. Chapter 11 (forthcoming)

Authors
Ella Whiteley
London School of Economics
Abstract
Consider a terrible situation that too many women find themselves in: 85,000 women are raped in England and Wales alone every year. Many of these women do not bring their cases to trial. There are multiple reasons that they might not want to testify in the courts. The incredibly low conviction rate is one. Another reason, however, might be that these women do not want the fact that they were raped to become the most salient thing about them. More specifically, they do not want it to be the thing that others attend to the most—that others find most noticeable and memorable. In this paper, I introduce the notion of ‘harmful salience perspectives’ to help to explain this and related phenomena. This refers either to attention on things that should not be salient, or not enough attention on things that deserve to be made salient. Following ideas within the feminist literature on objectification, I argue that we can be harmed when aspects of our identity that do not reflect our personhood—our agency, rationality, personality, and so on—are more prominent in the minds of others than aspects that do reflect our personhood. Crucially, these ways of attending do not need to implicate false beliefs and harmful ideologies to be harmful, but can be harmful in their own right.
Keywords salience  attention  ethics  personhood  harm
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Alief and Belief.Tamar Szabó Gendler - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy 105 (10):634-663.
The Sources of Normativity.Christine Korsgaard - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):384-394.
Responsibility for Implicit Bias.Jules Holroyd - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (3).
Considered Judgment.Catherine Z. Elgin - 1999 - Princeton University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Epistemic Injustice and the Attention Economy.Leonie Smith & Alfred Archer - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (5):777-795.
Stereotyping and Generics.Anne Bosse - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1-17.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Salience Perspectives.Ella Whiteley - 2019 - Dissertation, Cambridge University
Frontal Eye Field: A Cortical Salience Map.Kirk G. Thompson & Narcisse P. Bichot - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):699-700.
Salience Principles for Democracy.Susanna Siegel - forthcoming - In Sophie Archer (ed.), Salience. Taylor and Francis.
A Map Leading to Less Waste: Stakeholder Salience and Plastic Waste.David Saiia & Vananh Le - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:302-313.
Salience Reasoning.Gerald J. Postema - 2008 - Topoi 27 (1-2):41-55.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-11-21

Total views
38 ( #296,911 of 2,499,733 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #22,800 of 2,499,733 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes