History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (1):1-12 (1988)
This paper begins by pointing out that the Aristotelian conception of continuity (synecheia) and the contemporary topological account share the same intuitive, proto-topological basis: the conception of a ?natural whole? or unity without joints or seams. An argument of Aristotle to the effect that what is continuous cannot be constituted of ?indivisibles? (e.g., points) is examined from a topological perspective. From that perspective, the argument fails because Aristotle does not recognize a collective as well as a distributive concept of a multiplicity of points. It is the former concept that allows contemporary topology to identify some point sets with spatial regions (in the proto-topological sense of this term). This identification, in turn, allows contemporary topology to do what Aristotle was unwilling to do: to conceive the property of continuity, as well as the properties of having measure greater than zero and having n- dimension, as emergent properties. Thus, a point set can be continuous (connected) although none of its subsets of sufficiently smaller cardinality can be. Finally, the paper discusses the manner in which a topological principle, viz., the principle that none of the singletons of points of a continuum can be open sets of that continuum, captures certain aspects of the Aristotelian proto-topological conception of the relation between points and continua. E.g., for both Aristotle and contemporary topology, points in a continuum exist simple as limits of the remainder of the continuum: their singletons have empty ?interiors? and, hence, they are not ?chunks? (topologically, regular closed set) of the continuum
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Interval of Motion in Leibniz's Pacidius Philalethi.Samuel Levey - 2003 - Noûs 37 (3):371–416.
The Significance of a Non-Reductionist Ontology for the Discipline of Mathematics: A Historical and Systematic Analysis. [REVIEW]D. F. M. Strauss - 2010 - Axiomathes 20 (1):19-52.
Similar books and articles
Recursive Constructions in Topological Spaces.Iraj Kalantari & Allen Retzlaff - 1979 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 44 (4):609-625.
Aristotle and Modern Mathematical Theories of the Continuum.Anne Newstead - 2001 - In Demetra Sfendoni-Mentzou & James Brown (eds.), Aristotle and Contemporary Philosophy of Science. Peter Lang.
Does Topological Perception Rest on a Misconception About Topology?Roberto Casati - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (1):77 – 81.
Continuous Lattices and Whiteheadian Theory of Space.Thomas Mormann - 1998 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 6:35 - 54.
Nonstandard Analysis in Topology: Nonstandard and Standard Compactifications.S. Salbany & Todor Todorov - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (4):1836-1840.
Abstract Logics, Logic Maps, and Logic Homomorphisms.Steffen Lewitzka - 2007 - Logica Universalis 1 (2):243-276.
Added to index2009-08-27
Total downloads58 ( #85,232 of 2,037,250 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #204,552 of 2,037,250 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.