American Journal of Bioethics 7 (7):33 – 38 (2007)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Physicians make some medical decisions without disclosure to their patients. Nondisclosure is possible because these are silent decisions to refrain from screening, diagnostic or therapeutic interventions. Nondisclosure is ethically permissible when the usual presumption that the patient should be involved in decisions is defeated by considerations of clinical utility or patient emotional and physical well-being. Some silent decisions - not all - are ethically justified by this standard. Justified silent decisions are typically dependent on the physician's professional judgment, experience and knowledge, and are not likely to be changed by patient preferences. We condemn the inappropriate exclusion of the patient from the decision-making process. However, if a test or treatment is unlikely to yield a net benefit, disclosure and discussion are at times unnecessary. Appropriate silent decisions are ethically justified by such considerations as patient benefit or economy of time.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1080/15265160701399735 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Right and the Good.Some Problems in Ethics.W. D. Ross & H. W. B. Joseph - 1933 - Journal of Philosophy 30 (19):517-527.
View all 10 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Investigating Trust, Expertise, and Epistemic Injustice in Chronic Pain.Daniel Z. Buchman, Anita Ho & Daniel S. Goldberg - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (1):31-42.
Investigating Trust, Expertise, and Epistemic Injustice in Chronic Pain.Daniel Goldberg, Anita Ho & Daniel Buchman - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (1):31-42.
On the Cutting Edge: Ethical Responsiveness to Cesarean Rates.Sylvia Burrow - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):44-52.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Irrational Exuberance: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation as Fetish”.Philip M. Rosoff & Lawrence J. Schneiderman - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (2):W1 - W3.
Patient Autonomy and Choice in Healthcare: Self-Testing Devices as a Case in Point.Anna-Marie Greaney, Dónal P. O’Mathúna & P. Anne Scott - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (4):383-395.
View all 15 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Silent Decisions: Limits of Consent and the Terminally III Patient.Troyen A. Brennan - 1988 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (3-4):204-209.
The Not Unreasonable Standard for Assessment of Surrogates and Surrogate Decisions.Rosamond Rhodes & Ian Holzman - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):367-386.
Observations of Physician, Patient and Family Perceptions of Informed Consent in Houston, Texas.Eugene V. Boisaubin - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):225 – 236.
Conscientious Autonomy: Displacing Decisions in Health Care.Rebecca Kukla - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (2):34-44.
An Economic Theory of Patient Decision-Making.Douglas O. Stewart & Joseph P. DeMarco - 2005 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (3):153-164.
Patient Autonomy and the Challenge of Clinical Uncertainty.Mark Parascandola, Jennifer Hawkins & Marion Danis - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):245-264.
Non-Patient Decision-Making in Medicine: The Eclipse of Altruism.Margaret P. Battin - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):19-44.
Responses to Open Peer Commentaries on "Physicians' Silent Decisions: Because Patient Autonomy Doesn't Always Come First".Simon N. Whitney & Laurence B. McCullough - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (7):1-3.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
31 ( #366,178 of 2,499,057 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #419,059 of 2,499,057 )
2009-01-28
Total views
31 ( #366,178 of 2,499,057 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #419,059 of 2,499,057 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads