Foundations of Physics 34 (9):1305-1340 (2004)

Abstract
For many years after Bohr's response to the EPR argument, Bohr was considered to have provided an authoritative rebuttal of the ideas of the paper, and more generally of Einstein's stance on quantum theory. More recently, however, there has been great difficulty even in achieving general agreement on Bohr's meaning. Two recent papers, by Dickson, and by Clifton and Halvorson, have sought to establish the structure of Bohr's argument. In the present paper, the papers of EPR and Bohr are re-assessed in the light of these recent papers, and also in light of the development and presentation of quantum information theory
Keywords Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen  complementarity  Bohr  Einstein
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1023/B:FOOP.0000044095.69270.31
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,206
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Makes a Classical Concept Classical?Don Howard - 1994 - In Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 201--229.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

When Champions Meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein Debate.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (1):212-242.
When Champions Meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein Debate.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (1):212-242.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Re-Examined.David H. Sharp - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):225-233.
Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics.Dugald Murdoch - 1987 - Cambridge University Press.
On Bohr's Response to EPR: II. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Bub - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (8):929-941.
When Champions Meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein Debate.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (1):212-242.
Bohr's Response to Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen.David Z. Albert - 1992 - In Edna Ullmann-Margalit (ed.), The Scientific Enterprise. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 269--272.
Paul Dirac and the Einstein-Bohr Debate.Alisa Bokulich - 2008 - Perspectives on Science 16 (1):103-114.
Reconsidering Bohr's Reply to EPR.Hans Halvorson & Rob Clifton - 2001 - In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-locality and Modality. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 3--18.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
163 ( #64,620 of 2,448,343 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #304,462 of 2,448,343 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes