That Was the New Labour That Wasn't

Fabian Review (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The New Labour we got was different from the New Labour that might have been, had the reform agenda associated with stakeholding and pluralism in the early-1990s been fully realised. We investigate the road not taken and what it means for ‘one nation’ Labour.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Political Philosophy of New Labour.Matt Beech - 2005 - Distributed in the U.S. By Palgrave Macmillan.
Understanding participation.John Kaler - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 21 (2-3):125 - 135.
The Division of Moral Labour.Samuel Scheffler & Véronique Munoz-Dardé - 2005 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79 (1):229-284.
Exploitation via Labour Power in Marx.Henry Laycock - 1999 - The Journal of Ethics 3 (2):121--131.
I. labour: Marx's concrete universal.C. J. Arthur - 1978 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1-4):87 – 103.
More on exploitation and the labour theory of value.G. A. Cohen - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):309 – 331.
I. Marx's two-fold character of labour.Terrell Carver - 1980 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):349 – 352.
Justice and reciprocity.Bill Jordan - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (1):63-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-10

Downloads
897 (#8,678)

6 months
33 (#39,151)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references