- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why favour simplicity?
Analysis 65 (3):205-210 (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
| original | White, Roger (2005) "Why favour simplicity?". Analysis 65(3):205–210 |
My notes
Similar books and articles
The deadlock of absolute divine simplicity.Yann Schmitt - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):117-130.
Involuntary Simplicity: Changing Dysfunctional Habits of Consumption.Guy Claxton - 1994 - Environmental Values 3 (1):71 - 78.
17 Why Divine Simplicity Is Unnecessary.Stephen T. Davis - 2024 - In Mirosław Szatkowski (ed.), Ontology of Divinity. De Gruyter. pp. 347-356.
Simplicity and why the universe exists: A reply to Quentin Smith.Robert Deltete - 1998 - Philosophy 73 (3):490-494.
Why Emeralds are not Grue: A Case for Pragmatic Simplicity.Piotr Boltuc - 1998 - Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy 15.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-02-04
Downloads
29 (#627,077)
6 months
8 (#808,925)
2016-02-04
Downloads
29 (#627,077)
6 months
8 (#808,925)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Structure and Dynamics of Scientific Theories: A Hierarchical Bayesian Perspective.Leah Henderson, Noah D. Goodman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & James F. Woodward - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (2):172-200.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d5f778f9-g8xwj uwo