Risk, rationality, and regret: responding to the uncertainty of childhood food anaphylaxis

Medical Humanities 31 (1):12-16 (2005)

Abstract
Next SectionRisk and uncertainty are unavoidable in clinical medicine. In the case of childhood food allergy, the dysphoric experience of uncertainty is heightened by the perception of unpredictable danger to young children. Medicine has tended to respond to uncertainty with forms of rational decision making. Rationality cannot, however, resolve uncertainty and provides an insufficient account of risk. This paper compares the medical and parental accounts of two peanut allergic toddlers to highlight the value of emotions in decision making. One emotion in particular, regret, assists in explaining the actions taken to prevent allergic reactions, given the diffuse nature of responsibility for children. In this light, the assumption that doctors make rational judgments while patients have emotion led preferences is a false dichotomy. Reconciling medical and lay accounts requires acknowledgement of the interrelationship between the rational and the emotional, and may lead to more appropriate clinical decision making under conditions of uncertainty.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jmh.2004.000179
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,049
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Regret in Decision Making Under Uncertainty.David Bell - 1982 - Operations Research 30:961–81.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Economic (Ir)Rationality in Risk Analysis.Sven Ove Hansson - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (2):231-241.
Varieties of Risk Representations.John Kadvany - 1997 - Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (3):123-143.
Does Rationality Consist in Responding Correctly to Reasons?John Broome - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):349-374.
Varieties of Uncertainty Monitoring.John H. Flavell - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):344-344.
Trust, Risk, and Uncertainty.Sean Watson & Anthony Moran (eds.) - 2005 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Island Biogeography, Species-Area Curves, and Statistical Errors: Applied Biology and Scientific Rationality.Kristin S. Shrader-Frechette - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:447 - 456.
Quantification, Regulation, and Risk Assessment.Douglas MacLean - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:243 - 260.
Regret and the Control of Temporary Preferences.Terry Connolly & Jochen Reb - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):653-654.
Value in the Guise of Regret.Carla Bagnoli - 2000 - Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):169 – 187.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
20 ( #423,836 of 2,260,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #493,552 of 2,260,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature