Public Reason 2 (1):3-26 (2010)

Authors
Karl Widerquist
Georgetown University
Abstract
Although John Locke’s theory of appropriation is undoubtedly influential, no one seems to agree about exactly what he was trying to say. It is unlikely that someone will write the interpretation that effectively ends the controversy. Instead of trying to find the one definitive interpretation of Locke’s property theory, this article attempts to identify the range of reasonable interpretations and extensions of Lockean property theory that exist in the contemporary literature with an emphasis on his argument for unilateral appropriation. It goes through Locke’s argument point-by-point discussing the controversy over what he said and over what he perhaps should have said to make the most valuable and coherent argument. The result is an outline of Lockean theories of property: a menu of options by which one might use appropriation to justify property rights. Supporters only need to pick the version they find most plausible, but opponents should be aware of the entire menu. Anyone claiming to refute appropriation-based property rights must address not only one but all potentially valid versions of it.
Keywords Property  Property rights  Libertarianism  Locke  Appropriation  Taxation  Proviso
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,064
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two Treatises of Government.John Locke - 1988 - Cambridge University Press.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality.G. A. Cohen - 1995 - Cambridge University Press.
Libertarianism Without Inequality.Michael Otsuka - 2003 - Oxford University Press UK.

View all 75 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Self-Ownership and Non-Culpable Proviso Violations.Preston J. Werner - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (1):67-83.
Rothbard’s and Hoppe’s Justifications of Libertarianism: A Critique.Marian Eabrasu - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (3):288-307.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Lockean Justifications of Intellectual Property.Daniel Attas - 2008 - In Gosseries Axel, Marciano A. & Strowel A. (eds.), Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice. Basingstoke & N.Y.: Palgrave Mcmillan. pp. 29--56.
What Counts as Original Appropriation?Bas van der Vossen - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (4):355-373.
Self-Ownership and the Lockean Proviso.Tibor R. Machan - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):93-98.
The Lockean Enough-and-as-Good Proviso: An Internal Critique.Helga Varden - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3):410-442.
Imposing Duties and Original Appropriation.Bas Vossen - 2014 - Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (2):64-85.
Imposing Duties and Original Appropriation.Bas van der Vossen - 2015 - Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (1):64-85.
Justicia versus caridad en la teoría de la propiedad de Locke.Juliana Udi - 2012 - Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 38 (1):65-84.
Projects and Property.John T. Sanders - 2002 - In David Schmidtz (ed.), Robert Nozick. Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-07

Total views
72 ( #145,002 of 2,439,610 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #136,727 of 2,439,610 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes