Homosexual Sex and the One-Flesh Union

Roczniki Filozoficzne 63 (3):107-117 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I critically examine Alexander Pruss’s conception of the one-body union described in Genesis 2:24. Pruss appeals to his conception of the one-body union to advance two arguments for the conclusion that homosexual sex is morally wrong. I propose an alternative conception of the one- body union that implies that heterosexual and homosexual couples alike can participate in the one-body union; I take that implication of my account to be a significant advantage over Pruss’s account.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Law Made Flesh: Homosexual Acts.Leslie J. Moran - 1999 - Body and Society 5 (1):39-55.
The Rhetoric of Homosexual Practice.John J. Anderson - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (4):601-625.
The Death of the Homosexual.Blazej Warkocki - 2010 - Dialogue and Universalism 20 (5-6):139-152.
La chair comme diacritique incarné.Emmanuel Alloa - 2009 - Chiasmi International 11:249-262.
A union catalogue of philosophical periodicals.Bikash Kumar Bhattacharya - 1989 - New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research in association with Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers. Edited by Subhas C. Biswas.
Flesh of My Flesh.Una Kroll - 1975 - Darton Longman and Todd.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
88 (#185,735)

6 months
10 (#207,941)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Erik Wielenberg
DePauw University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references