Ethics 120 (3):441-464 (2010)

Authors
Erik Wielenberg
DePauw University
Abstract
Evolutionary debunkers of morality hold this thesis: If S’s moral belief that P can be given an evolutionary explanation, then S’s moral belief that P is not knowledge. In this paper, I debunk a variety of arguments for this thesis. I first sketch a possible evolutionary explanation for some human moral beliefs. Next, I explain how, given a reliabilist approach to warrant, my account implies that humans possess moral knowledge. Finally, I examine the debunking arguments of Michael Ruse, Sharon Street, and Richard Joyce. I draw on the account of moral knowledge sketched earlier to illustrate how these arguments fail.
Keywords Ruse  Street  Joyce  evolutionary ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/652292
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,707
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Debunking Arguments.Daniel Z. Korman - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (12).
Evolutionary Debunking of Moral Realism.Katia Vavova - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (2):104-116.

View all 66 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-06-12

Total views
674 ( #6,670 of 2,333,204 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #26,068 of 2,333,204 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes