Parental Obligation

Utilitas 23 (3):249-267 (2011)
Abstract
The contention of this article is that parents do have obligations to care for their children, but for reasons that are not typically offered. I argue that this obligation to care for one’s children is unfair to parents but not unjust. I do not provide a detailed account of what our obligations are to our children. Rather, I focus on providing a justification for any obligation to care for them at all.
Keywords children  associative obligations  special obligations  feminism  filial obligations  parenthood
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820811000136
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Law's Empire.R. DWORKIN - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
Legitimate Parental Partiality.Harry Brighouse - 2009 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (1):43-80.
Against Marriage and Motherhood.Claudia Card - 1996 - Hypatia 11 (3):1 - 23.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Theory of Filial Obligations.Brynn F. Welch - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (4):717-737.
Associative Political Obligations.Bas van der Vossen - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (7):477-487.
Associative Political Obligations.A. John Simmons - 1996 - Ethics 106 (2):247-273.
Political Obligations.George Klosko - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Does Obligation Diminish with Distance?Gillian Brock - 2005 - Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (1):3 – 20.
Added to PP index
2011-04-01

Total downloads
383 ( #8,332 of 2,223,771 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #17,910 of 2,223,771 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature