Anselm’s Ontological Argument and Aristotle’s Elegktikōs Apodeixai

Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 86:129-140 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Saint Anselm’s ontological argument is usually interpreted either (1) as an attempt to deductively prove God’s existence or (2) as a form of prayer, which is not intended to “prove” God’s existence, but rather to deepen the devotion of those who already believe. In this paper I attempt to find a mean between these two interpretations, showing that while Anselm’s argument is not a deductive proof, it is nevertheless a proof of God’s existence. I argue that Anselm’s ontological argument is analogous to Aristotle’s to elegktikōs apodeixai (retorsive argument) for the truth of the principle of non-contradiction in Metaphysics IV: an argument that does not move from premises to conclusion, but rather demonstrates the truth of its conclusion by showing that its conclusion is always presupposed. I argue that interpreting Anselm’s ontological argument in this way exempts it from the most common objections against it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-28

Downloads
67 (#218,944)

6 months
6 (#201,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Wiitala
Cleveland State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references