Values in Psychometrics

Perspectives on Psychological Science (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


When it originated in the late 19th century, psychometrics was a field with both a scientific and a social mission: psychometrics provided new methods for research into individual differences, and at the same time, these psychometric instruments were considered a means to create a new social order. In contrast, contemporary psychometrics - due to its highly technical nature and its limited involvement in substantive psychological research - has created the impression of being a value-free discipline. In this article, we develop a contrasting characterization of contemporary psychometrics as a value-laden discipline. We expose four such values: that individual differences are quantitative (rather than qualitative), that measurement should be objective in a specific sense, that test items should be fair, and that utility of a model is more important than its truth. Our goal is not to criticize psychometrics for employing these values, but rather to bring them into the open and to show that these values are not inevitable and are in need of systematic evaluation.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Psychometrics versus Representational Theory of Measurement.Elina Vessonen - 2017 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (4-5):330-350.
Sociobiology and psychometrics: Do they really need each other?John Rust - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):117 – 129.
The Complementarity of Psychometrics and the Representational Theory of Measurement.Elina Vessonen - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (2):415-442.
Psychological and other aspects of the sign arbitrariness.Miroslav Brada - 2017 - le Cours de Linguistique Générale 1916-2016.
Is Construct Validation Valid?Anna Alexandrova & Daniel M. Haybron - 2016 - Philosophy of Science 83 (5):1098-1109.
To Measure or Not to Measure? Psychometrics and Conspiracy Theories.Marius Hans Raab - 2018 - In M. R. X. Dentith (ed.), Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously. London: Rowman and Littlefield. pp. 155-169.
Present-Day Psychology. [REVIEW]B. R. - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 10 (1):188-188.


Added to PP

798 (#16,311)

6 months
125 (#22,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Heather Douglas - 2009 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Objectivity.Lorraine Daston & Peter Galison - 2007 - Cambridge, Mass.: Zone Books. Edited by Peter Galison.
The Mismeasure of Man.Stephen Jay Gould - 1980 - W.W. Norton and Company.
Inductive risk and values in science.Heather Douglas - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (4):559-579.

View all 19 references / Add more references