Perspectives on Psychological Science (forthcoming)
AbstractWhen it originated in the late 19th century, psychometrics was a field with both a scientific and a social mission: psychometrics provided new methods for research into individual differences, and at the same time, these psychometric instruments were considered a means to create a new social order. In contrast, contemporary psychometrics - due to its highly technical nature and its limited involvement in substantive psychological research - has created the impression of being a value-free discipline. In this article, we develop a contrasting characterization of contemporary psychometrics as a value-laden discipline. We expose four such values: that individual differences are quantitative (rather than qualitative), that measurement should be objective in a specific sense, that test items should be fair, and that utility of a model is more important than its truth. Our goal is not to criticize psychometrics for employing these values, but rather to bring them into the open and to show that these values are not inevitable and are in need of systematic evaluation.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
A Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science.Kevin C. Elliott - 2017 - Oxford University Press USA.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Psychometrics Versus Representational Theory of Measurement.Elina Vessonen - 2017 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (4-5):330-350.
Sociobiology and Psychometrics: Do They Really Need Each Other?John Rust - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):117 – 129.
Psychological Measurement and Methodological Realism.S. Brian Hood - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (4):739-761.
The Complementarity of Psychometrics and the Representational Theory of Measurement.Elina Vessonen - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (2):415-442.
Psychological and Other Aspects of the Sign Arbitrariness.Miroslav Brada - 2017 - le Cours de Linguistique Générale 1916-2016.
The Fashionable Scientific Fraud: Collingwood’s Critique of Psychometrics.Joel Michell - 2020 - History of the Human Sciences 33 (2):3-21.
The Role of Psychometrics in Individual Differences Research in Cognition: A Case Study of the AX-CPT.Shelly R. Cooper, Corentin Gonthier, Deanna M. Barch & Todd S. Braver - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
Is Construct Validation Valid?Anna Alexandrova & Daniel M. Haybron - 2016 - Philosophy of Science 83 (5):1098-1109.
Measuring the Mind: Conceptual Issues in Contemporary Psychometrics.Denny Borsboom - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
Woodworth Scale Values of the Lightfoot Pictures of Facial Expression.Nissim Levy & Harold Schlosberg - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (2):121.
To Measure or Not to Measure? Psychometrics and Conspiracy Theories.Marius Hans Raab - 2018 - In M. R. X. Dentith (ed.), Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously. London: Rowman and Littlefield. pp. 155-169.
Back to the Future of Quantitative Psychology and Measurement: Psychometrics in the Twenty-First Century.Pietro Cipresso & Jason C. Immekus - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
Research on Group Differences in Intelligence: A Defense of Free Inquiry.Nathan Cofnas - 2020 - Philosophical Psychology 33 (1):125-147.
Present-Day Psychology: An Original Survey of Departments, Branches, Methods, and Phases, Including Clinical and Dynamic Psychology. [REVIEW]B. R. - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 10 (1):188-188.