Minds and Machines 14 (4):539-549 (2004)
The relationship between machine learning and the philosophy of science can be classed as a dynamic interaction: a mutually beneficial connection between two autonomous fields that changes direction over time. I discuss the nature of this interaction and give a case study highlighting interactions between research on Bayesian networks in machine learning and research on causality and probability in the philosophy of science
|Keywords||Computer Science Philosophy of Mind Artificial Intelligence Systems Theory, Control Interdisciplinary Studies|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Machine Learning Theory and Practice as a Source of Insight Into Universal Grammar.Shalom Lappin - unknown
Machine Learning Theory and Practice as a Source of Insight Into Universal Grammar. StuartmShieber - unknown
Brave Mobots Use Representation: Emergence of Representation in Fight-or-Flight Learning. [REVIEW]Chris Thornton - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (4):475-494.
Choosing From Competing Theories in Computerised Learning.Abraham Meidan & Boris Levin - 2002 - Minds and Machines 12 (1):119-129.
Argument Based Machine Learning Applied to Law.Martin Možina, Jure Žabkar, Trevor Bench-Capon & Ivan Bratko - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):53-73.
Introduction: Machine Learning as Philosophy of Science.Kevin B. Korb - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (4):433-440.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads58 ( #90,394 of 2,168,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #82,721 of 2,168,922 )
How can I increase my downloads?