Religious Studies 37 (1):59-74 (2001)
AbstractIn this paper I examine William Alston's work on the epistemology of religious belief, focusing on the threat to the epistemic status of Christian belief presented by awareness of religious diversity. I argue that Alston appears to misunderstand the epistemic significance of the ‘practical rationality’ of the Christian mystical practice. I suggest that this error is due to a more fundamental misunderstanding, regarding the significance of practical rationality, in Alston's ‘doxastic practice’ approach to epistemology ; an error that leads to arbitrariness among the class of rational doxastic practices. I suggest how one might remedy this weakness, with an additional, epistemic, criterion that rational doxastic practices must satisfy
Similar books and articles
In Defence of a Contented Religious Exclusivism.Jerome Gellman - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (4):401-417.
The Epistemological Challenge of Religious Pluralism.John Hick - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (3):277-286.
Religious Experience as an Observational Epistemic Practice.Bruce R. Reichenbach - 2012 - Sophia 51 (1):1-16.
A Problem with Alston's Indirect Analogy-Argument From Religious Experience.Ulf Zackariasson - 2006 - Religious Studies 42 (3):329-341.
The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity.Philip L. Quinn & Kevin Meeker (eds.) - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Practical and Epistemic Justification in Alston’s "Perceiving God".John Turri - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (3):290 - 299.
Plantinga's Epistemology of Religious Belief and the Problem of Religious Diversity.Julian Willard - 2003 - Heythrop Journal 44 (3):275–293.
Religious Tolerance Through Religious Diversity and Epistemic Humility.James Kraft - 2006 - Sophia 45 (2):101-116.
Perceptual Experience, Doxastic Practice, and the Rationality of Religious Commitment.Robert Audi - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:1-18.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads