American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2):189-208 (2007)
Abelard maintains that individual words in a sentence represent distinct semantic units of its overall meaning. He employs two strategies to defend thisposition in the face of troublesome counterexamples. One strategy—the earlier of the two—sacrifices normal intuitions about what a word is, often labeling whatseem to be words as non-signifying syllables. The later strategy invokes a rather fluid conception of what the signification of a word is, allowing this significationconsiderable latitude to alter under the contextual influence of other words. This evolution of strategy is linked to a new willingness on Abelard’s part to adopt theprinciple of charity in interpreting sentences; this approach presumes the truth of the statement, and tries to find an interpretation which bears that presumptionout. This new willingness to adopt the principle is in turn linked to Abelard’s developing vocation as an interpreter of biblical texts
|Keywords||Catholic Tradition Contemporary Philosophy History of Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Woman's Thought or a Man's Discipline? The Letters of Abelard and Heloise.Andrea Nye - 1992 - Hypatia 7 (3):1 - 22.
Peculiar Perfection: Peter Abelard on Propositional Attitudes.Martin Lenz - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):377-386.
Are Thoughts and Sentences Compositional? A Controversy Between Abelard and a Pupil of Alberic on the Reconciliation of Ancient Theses on Mind and Language.Martin Lenz - 2007 - Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):169-188.
Abelard on Mental Language.Peter King - 2007 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2):169-187.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #374,755 of 2,164,542 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,995 of 2,164,542 )
How can I increase my downloads?