Bayesian nets and causality
Abstract
How should we reason with causal relationships? Much recent work on this question has been devoted to the theses (i) that Bayesian nets provide a calculus for causal reasoning and (ii) that we can learn causal relationships by the automated learning of Bayesian nets from observational data. The aim of this book is to..Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Bayesian Nets and Causality: Philosophical and Computational Foundations.Jon Williamson - 2004 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Jon Williamson bayesian nets and causality.Clark Glymour - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):849-855.
Jon Williamson. Bayesian nets and causality: Philosophical and computational foundations.Kevin B. Korb - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (3):389-396.
Jon Williamson, bayesian nets and causality: Philosophical and computational foundations. [REVIEW]Bradford McCall - 2008 - Minds and Machines 18 (2):301-302.
Combining argumentation and bayesian nets for breast cancer prognosis.Matt Williams & Jon Williamson - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (1-2):155-178.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
32 (#367,193)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
2009-01-28
Downloads
32 (#367,193)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Interpreting causality in the health sciences.Federica Russo & Jon Williamson - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (2):157 – 170.
Inference to the Best explanation.Peter Lipton - 2004 - In Martin Curd & Stathis Psillos (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. Routledge. pp. 193.
Causal graphs and biological mechanisms.Alexander Gebharter & Marie I. Kaiser - 2014 - In Marie I. Kaiser, Oliver Scholz, Daniel Plenge & Andreas Hüttemann (eds.), Explanation in the special sciences: The case of biology and history. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 55-86.
Evolutionary Epistemology and the Aim of Science.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):209-225.
