British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):851-857 (2012)
This note responds to some criticisms of my recent book In Defence of Objective Bayesianism that were provided by Gregory Wheeler in his ‘Objective Bayesian Calibration and the Problem of Non-convex Evidence’
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Objective Bayesian Calibration and the Problem of Non-Convex Evidence.Gregory Wheeler - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):841-850.
Evidential Probability and Objective Bayesian Epistemology.Gregory Wheeler & Jon Williamson - 2011 - In Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Malcolm Forster (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Statistics. Elsevier.
Bayesian Statistics in Radiocarbon Calibration.Daniel Steel - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S153-.
The Calibration Question.Frank Lad - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (3):213-221.
Calibration, Coherence, and Scoring Rules.Teddy Seidenfeld - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):274-294.
Book Review Change, Choice and Inference. [REVIEW]Gregory Wheeler - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (3):498-503.
Probability and Inference: Essays in Honour of Henry E. Kyburg, Jr.William Harper & Gregory Wheeler - 2007 - College Publications.
Added to index2012-05-04
Total downloads39 ( #131,488 of 2,163,615 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,037 of 2,163,615 )
How can I increase my downloads?