Commodification Arguments for the Legal Prohibition of Organ Sale

Health Care Analysis 8 (2):189-201 (2000)
Authors
Stephen Wilkinson
Lancaster University
Abstract
The commercial trading of human organs, along withvarious related activities (for example, advertising)was criminalised throughout Great Britain under theHuman Organ Transplants Act 1989.This paper critically assesses one type of argumentfor this, and similar, legal prohibitions:commodification arguments.Firstly, the term `commodification' is analysed. Thiscan be used to refer to either social practices or toattitudes. Commodification arguments rely on thesecond sense and are based on the idea that having acommodifying attitude to certain classes of thing(e.g. bodies or persons) is wrong. The commodifyingattitude consists of three main elements: denial ofsubjectivity, instrumentality, and fungibility.Secondly, in the light of this analysis, the claimthat organ sale involves commodifying the human bodyis examined. This claim is found to be plausible butinsufficient to ground an argument against organ sale,because the very same commodifying attitude is likelyto be present in cases of (unpaid) organ donation. Itis also argued that commodifying bodies per semay not be wrong.Thirdly, the view that organ sale involvescommodifying persons is examined. Although this andthe claim that it is wrong to commodify persons areprobably true, there is – it is argued – littlereason to regard organ sale as worse in this respectthan other widely accepted practices, such as thebuying and selling of labour.The conclusion is that although commodification is auseful ethical concept and although commodificationarguments may sometimes be successful, thecommodification argument against organ sale is notpersuasive. This is not to say, though, that thereare no arguments for prohibition – simply that thisparticular justificatory strategy is flawed
Keywords body commodification  Brecher  commodification  organ sale
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1009454612900
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,829
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Recognition as Redistribution.Renante D. Pilapil - 2014 - Critical Horizons 15 (3):284-305.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Public Policy and the Sale of Human Organs.Cynthia B. Cohen - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (1):47-64.
The Morality of a Free Market for Transplant Organs.Mark T. Nelson - 1991 - Public Affairs Quarterly 5 (1):63-79.
Ambivalence, Autonomy, and Organ Sales.Paul M. Hughes - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):237-251.
Paying for Kidneys: The Case Against Prohibition.Michael B. Gill & Robert M. Sade - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (1):17-45.
Is a Market in Human Organs Necessarily Exploitative?Mark J. Cherry - 2000 - Public Affairs Quarterly 14 (4):337--360.
An Organ Sale by Any Other Name.Jerry Menikoff - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (4):42 – 44.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total downloads
102 ( #62,593 of 2,293,787 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #411,043 of 2,293,787 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature