Computer decision-support systems for public argumentation: assessing deliberative legitimacy [Book Review]
AI and Society 19 (3):203-228 (2004)
Recent proposals for computer-assisted argumentation have drawn on dialectical models of argumentation. When used to assist public policy planning, such systems also raise questions of political legitimacy. Drawing on deliberative democratic theory, we elaborate normative criteria for deliberative legitimacy and illustrate their use for assessing two argumentation systems. Full assessment of such systems requires experiments in which system designers draw on expertise from the social sciences and enter into the policy deliberation itself at the level of participants.
|Keywords||Argumentation Computer-mediated decisions Decision support systems|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.Richard E. Nisbett & Lee Ross - 1980 - Prentice-Hall.
The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, 'Reason and the Rationalization of Society'.Jürgen Habermas - 1984 - Polity..
Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.David M. Rasmussen, Jurgen Habermas, Christian Lenhardt & Shierry Weber Nicholsen - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173):571.
Citations of this work BETA
Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry.Marcin Lewiński & Mark Aakhus - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (2):161-185.
Similar books and articles
Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance.John S. Dryzek - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy.John Parkinson (ed.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Why Deliberative Democracy is (Still) Untenable.Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij - 2012 - Public Affairs Quarterly 26 (3):199-220.
Democratic Legitimacy and Proceduralist Social Epistemology.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Argumentation and Risk Communication About Genetic Testing: Challenges for Healthcare Consumers and Implications for Computer Systems.Nancy Green - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):113-129.
Computer Crime: Assessing the Lawyer's Perspective. [REVIEW]Karen A. Forcht, Daphyne Thomas & Karen Wigginton - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (4):243 - 251.
Making Public Bioethics Sufficiently Public: The Legitimacy and Authority of Bioethics Commissions.Summer Johnson - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):143-152.
Computational Dialectic and Rhetorical Invention.Douglas Walton - 2012 - AI and Society 26 (1):2011.
Rawls' Idea of Public Reason and Democratic Legitimacy.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Journal of International Political Theory 3 (1):129-143.
Regulation of hESC Research in Australia: Promises and Pitfalls for Deliberative Democratic Approaches. [REVIEW]Susan Dodds & Rachel A. Ankeny - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):95-107.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads31 ( #158,579 of 2,143,470 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #70,831 of 2,143,470 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.