Confusion in cladism

Synthese 91 (1-2):135 - 152 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Phylogenetic Systematics (1966), Willi Hennig conflates the Linnaean hierarchy with what Hennig refers to as the divisional hierarchy. In doing so, he lays the foundations of that school of biological taxonomy known as cladism on a philosophically ambiguous basis. This paper compares and contrasts the two hierarchies and demonstrates that Hennig conflates them. It shows that Hennig's followers also conflate them. Finally, it illuminates five persistent problems in cladism by suggesting that they arise from Hennig's original confusion.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,455

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The role of theories in biological systematics.David L. Hull - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (2):221-238.
The role of theories in biological systematics.L. D. - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (2):221-238.
The evolution of the linnaean hierarchy.Marc Ereshefsky - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):493-519.
Essentialism, history, and biological taxa.Makmiller Pedroso - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1):182-190.
Systematics and Taxonomy.Marc Ereshefsky - 2008 - In Sahorta Sarkar & Anya Plutynski, Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Blackwell. pp. 99–118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
85 (#273,672)

6 months
13 (#325,198)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?