Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (4):669-688 (2007)

Abstract
The relationship between corporate executives and shareholders has riveted the attention of business ethicists since the inception of the field. Most ethicists agree that corporate executives owe their investors the duties of loyalty, candor, and care. These fiduciary duties undergird the promises made to shareholders at the time of incorporation, placing on executives moral obligations to engage in fair dealing and to avoid conflicts of interest.We concur that executives owe all of their existing shareholders both promise-keeping and fiduciary duties and argue that some corporateexecutives violate these responsibilities by attempting to withhold information from or limit information to some shareholders while courting others. We analyze the ethical implications of six techniques and tools that executives use to attract certain types of shareholders while deterring others. We conclude with recommended structural and behavioral changes to these current managerial and investor practices.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Business and Professional Ethics  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2008
ISBN(s) 1052-150X
DOI beq20071744
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Do Shareholders Have Obligations to Stakeholders?Earl W. Spurgin - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):287 - 297.
Corporate Democracy and the Rights of Shareholders.William Irvine - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (1-2):99 - 108.
The Ethics of Going Private.Douglas A. Houston & John S. Howe - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (7):519 - 525.
Shareholder Theory and Kant’s ‘Duty of Beneficence’.Samuel Mansell - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3):583-599.
A Fiduciary Argument Against Stakeholder Theory.Alexei M. Marcoux - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1):1-24.
Corporate Capital Ownership in the United States: Rise and Historical Place.Zi-li He - 1997 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2:14-20.
Shareholders and Corporate Community Involvement in Britain.Julia Clarke - 1997 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 6 (4):201–207.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-23

Total views
28 ( #408,277 of 2,506,410 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,410 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes