Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):709-710 (2001)
Roger Shepard's description of an abstract representational space defined by landmark objects and kinematic transformations between them fails to successfully capture the essence of the perceptual tasks he expects of it, such as object recognition. Ultimately, objects are recognized in the context of events. The dynamic nature of events is what determines the perceived kinematic behavior, and it is at the level of dynamics that events can be classified as types. [Shepard].
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chaotic Dynamics and Psychophysical Parallelism.Robert A. M. Gregson - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):541-542.
The Internalization of Physical Constraints From a Developmental Perspective.Horst Krist - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):681-682.
Motion Percepts: “Sense Specific,” “Kinematic,” or . . . ?A. H. Wertheim - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):338-340.
Two Visual Systems Must Still Perceive Events.J. Alex Shull & Geoffrey P. Bingham - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):118-119.
Is Kinematic Geometry an Internalized Regularity?Dejan Todorovic - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):641-651.
Poincare's Contributions to Relativistic Dynamics.G. Granek - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (1):15-48.
Probability Kinematics and Probability Dynamics.Lydia McGrew - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Research 35:89-105.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #525,935 of 2,171,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,967 of 2,171,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?