Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):409-418 (2007)

Authors
Stephen Wilkinson
Lancaster University
Abstract
This article provides a critical assessment of some aspects of Ann Kerr and Tom Shakespeare's Genetic Politics: from eugenics to genome. In particular, I evaluate their claims: (a) that bioethics is too ‘top down’, involving normative prescriptions, whereas it should instead be ‘bottom up’ and grounded in social science; and (b) that contemporary bioethics has not dealt particularly well with people's moral concerns about eugenics. I conclude that several of Kerr and Shakespeare's criticisms are well-founded and serve as valuable reminders to the bioethics community. These include the claims: that bioethics ought not to consist entirely of applying moral theory to cases; that bioethics must take account of relevant empirical evidence; and that bioethicists should be on the look out for those subtle social forces which can undermine the voluntariness of people's choices and consents. However, we should reject some of Kerr and Shakespeare's other criticisms and I conclude (amongst other things) that even ‘mainstream’ bioethics is better able to deal with difficult issues like eugenics than Kerr and Shakespeare suggest.
Keywords Philosophy   Ontology   Political Philosophy   Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-006-9058-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,586
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics.Onora O'Neill - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Not Just Autonomy--The Principles of American Biomedical Ethics.S. Holm - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (6):332-338.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Review: Eugenics and the Criticism of Bioethics. [REVIEW]Stephen Wilkinson - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):409 - 418.
"Eugenics Talk" and the Language of Bioethics.S. Wilkinson - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (6):467-471.
Mary Briody Mahowald, Bioethics and Women, Across the Life Span.Leah McClimans - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (2):229-230.
David DeGrazia, Human Identity and Bioethics.Bertha Alvarez Manninen - 2009 - Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (4):537-546.
The Situational Context on the Nature of Political Philosophy.Yoram Levy - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (5):535-556.
Bioethics and Conflicts of Interest.Richard E. Ashcroft - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (1):155-165.
Politically Correct Eugenics.David Gems - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):201-213.
Keeping It Open: Ontology, Ethics, Knowledge and Radical Democracy.A. Kioupkiolis - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (6):691-708.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
79 ( #120,234 of 2,348,619 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #186,189 of 2,348,619 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes