Evolutionary debunking arguments in three domains: Fact, value, and religion

In James Maclaurin Greg Dawes (ed.), A New Science of Religion. Routledge (2012)
Abstract
Ever since Darwin people have worried about the sceptical implications of evolution. If our minds are products of evolution like those of other animals, why suppose that the beliefs they produce are true, rather than merely useful? We consider this problem for beliefs in three different domains: religion, morality, and commonsense and scientific claims about matters of empirical fact. We identify replies to evolutionary scepticism that work in some domains but not in others. One reply is that evolution can be expected to design systems that produce true beliefs in some domain. This reply works for commonsense beliefs and can be extended to scientific beliefs. But it does not work for moral or religious beliefs. An alternative reply which has been used defend moral beliefs is that their truth does not consist in their tracking some external state of affairs. Whether or not it is successful in the case of moral beliefs, this reply is less plausible for religious beliefs. So religious beliefs emerge as particularly vulnerable to evolutionary debunking.
Keywords Evolutionary epistemology  Philosophy of religion  Alvin Pantinga
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Explaining Religion (Away?).Jonathan Jong - 2012 - Sophia 52 (3):521-533.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
What's Wrong with the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism?Geoff Childers - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):193-204.
Evolutionary Debunking Arguments.Guy Kahane - 2011 - Noûs 45 (1):103-125.
When Psychology Undermines Beliefs.Derek Leben - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology (3):1-23.
The Evolutionary Social Psychology of Religious Beliefs.Lee A. Kirkpatrick - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):741-741.
What is a Religious Ethic?John P. Reeder Jr - 1997 - Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):157 - 181.
Rejoinder to Mawson.Brian Zamulinski - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (3):365-366.
Added to PP index
2012-09-10

Total downloads
1,028 ( #783 of 2,197,295 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
127 ( #863 of 2,197,295 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature