Evolutionary debunking arguments in three domains: Fact, value, and religion

In James Maclaurin Greg Dawes (ed.), A New Science of Religion. Routledge (2012)
Authors
John Wilkins
University of Melbourne
Paul Edmund Griffiths
University of Sydney
Abstract
Ever since Darwin people have worried about the sceptical implications of evolution. If our minds are products of evolution like those of other animals, why suppose that the beliefs they produce are true, rather than merely useful? We consider this problem for beliefs in three different domains: religion, morality, and commonsense and scientific claims about matters of empirical fact. We identify replies to evolutionary scepticism that work in some domains but not in others. One reply is that evolution can be expected to design systems that produce true beliefs in some domain. This reply works for commonsense beliefs and can be extended to scientific beliefs. But it does not work for moral or religious beliefs. An alternative reply which has been used defend moral beliefs is that their truth does not consist in their tracking some external state of affairs. Whether or not it is successful in the case of moral beliefs, this reply is less plausible for religious beliefs. So religious beliefs emerge as particularly vulnerable to evolutionary debunking.
Keywords Evolutionary epistemology  Philosophy of religion  Alvin Pantinga
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Explaining Religion (Away?).Jonathan Jong - 2013 - Sophia 52 (3):521-533.
Is Supernatural Belief Unreliably Formed.Hans Van Eyghen - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion:1-24.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What's Wrong with the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism?Geoff Childers - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):193-204.
Evolutionary Debunking Arguments.Guy Kahane - 2011 - Noûs 45 (1):103-125.
When Psychology Undermines Beliefs.Derek Leben - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology (3):1-23.
The Evolutionary Social Psychology of Religious Beliefs.Lee A. Kirkpatrick - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):741-741.
What is a Religious Ethic?John P. Reeder Jr - 1997 - Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):157 - 181.
Rejoinder to Mawson.Brian Zamulinski - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (3):365-366.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-09-10

Total downloads
1,277 ( #963 of 2,287,477 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
126 ( #2,254 of 2,287,477 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature